Criminal Appeal ??\\\' Allegation of police brutality and oppression prior to start of police interview
??\\\' oral admissions contained in answers to police questioning taken down in a record of
interview ??\\\' signed written confession obtained during interview which accused denied authoring
or signing ??\\\' voir dire commenced to determine admissibility of both documents ??\\\' whether judge
erred in prematurely terminating voir dire and admitting both documents without ruling on
admissibility ??\\\' Non-disclosure by Crown of video-recording of police interview ??\\\' Late2
production of recording during the ongoing voir dire ??\\\' whether late production of the recording
prejudiced the conduct of the defence during the voir dire ??\\\' whether conviction unsafe and
unsatisfactory Pending before Privy Council?: no
Click the icon to the right to download this Judgment. |